🔗 Share this article Should We Are Witnessing the Decline of the Cult of Attacking Play, Let’s Appreciate What It Created. The Journey of a Cult can be characterized by specific steps. 1. The Grand Vision A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea pledging a solution for alienated and vulnerable people. So here we are. Plans are in motion to storm the compound down in Brisbane. Tensions are rising. Smoke is rising from the sidelines. An isolated player, exposed, nervous, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT written on his body in chicken blood, has emerged through the lines and is removed under a blanket to a different team in county cricket. Do you recall the beginning, when optimism reigned? The initial phase, of pure instinct. 2. The Honeymoon Phase Movement founders guarantee a new start, hope for a future, support, success among a group who all believe in the philosophy. How did it feel back then? Players celebrating enjoying success. Ink. Muscles. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, The squad insist they don’t use the label, which is funny as it’s denied, what was that spectacle? Yet it’s clear its essence. It’s Harry Brook attempting a move so outrageous it defies description. It’s the excitement of the captain at his peak, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, rugged appearance, hair woven from beaver hide, truly contemporary you almost imagine to glance over and find him positioned in the field bare-chested holding a fish. It’s Ben Duckett often seen to talk in press conferences, out there looking like a cheerful animal smartly dressed, saying stuff like we are actively deconstructing the orange. Indeed, the energy, for a significant period, was uplifting. 3. Expansion Period Development stage. Unity enforced through repetition of key phrases. These principles may seem irrational as a loyalty check. Does anyone else feel? The backlash, the outrage, the sense of betrayal following the initial loss seems too strong, overdone. England batted badly on the field, as is typical there. They were dominated while bowling for a couple of hours as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, outplayed by the batsman batting like England but better, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with aura. Currently, we see the criticism, the frustration, the perception of the team as a failure. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they must be humbled, to be scoured, destroyed, defeated through sheer skill of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the low-fi orthodoxies of the bowler, marking successes humbly like he’s just been given a rewarding prize. What will this do to them? 4. External Conflict Challenges surface because of mistakes. Yet, mistakes are denied. It turns to anger towards critics. The fact remains, approaching the upcoming game, we have now reached a critical juncture in the journey of this approach. England could quite easily win in Brisbane with bold tactics. More likely, defeat could come swiftly. Should they fail it feels like we may see the final stage. Prior to that, a couple of points worth saying regarding this. In the past, at the start, of light and heat, an piece was published labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which was helpful since it’s clear the best way of proving lack of cult status is when its acolytes respond with anger denying scrutiny of the beliefs. The developments lately are fascinating. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. We have a uniformly angry internet, critical analysts, images of frustrated travelling fans disappointed by the short match, reminiscent of people wanting fairness. Meanwhile, exists the larger scene of Australia’s more nuanced deep-seated frustration at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, out there saying, the methods you value and have fostered and nurtured as part of your identity from others, well, it’s all a bit of a gag in the end old boy. And this is the real point. All movements are similar. The approach was a phenomenon since the sport itself is insular. Or at least, the sport in England is closed, a group, a private event, an insular community with two hundred years of opaque and ritualistic cult history behind it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the imperial sport of England, the original sports washers. And surprisingly, the nation has its own culture, a structure of hidden ranks, a place that literally still has a king. The players have been isolated in this system since childhood. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are simply replicating their own experience, building another enclosure, an exclusive group, but now with a new team and a mentor encouraging individuality if you fit the mold. Live where your feet are. Run towards the danger. However much you change, you remain stuck. With this mind, it might be appropriate to offer compassion for the movement, to recognize its positives, of which there are many. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with